Europe’s GDPR coincides with huge drop in Android apps
Privacy rules increase cost, reduce choice, slash revenues, study concludes. But is it the case?
Privacy rules increase cost, reduce choice, slash revenues, study concludes. But is it the case?
A paper published by the world’s main central bank umbrella group has called for individuals and firms to be given more control over the data collected on them.
They’re responsible for deeply personal information.
Apple’s landmark App Tracking Transparency may not be as tough as some people think.
The researchers found that all of the videoconferencing apps they tested occasionally gather raw audio data while mute is activated.
Double-standard rules have strengthened iGiant’s gatekeeper power.
This paper argues that traditional privacy law has a great deal to learn from the guidelines for informed consent that applies in federally funded biomedical and behavioral research.
This paper aims to critically assess the information duties set out in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and national adaptations when the purpose of processing is scientific research.
This Article analyses the framework of rules governing the processing of personal data for scientific research purposes established by the European Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
This article aims to provide an overview of the new rules to consider where scientific projects include the processing of personal health data, genetic data or biometric data and other kinds of sensitive information.
When complying with appropriate safeguards, the processing of personal data for scientifc research under the GDPR benefts from a special regime which is of interest for biobank research.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) allows researchers to process and further use personal data under the ‘research exemption’.